1 July, 2009
So long as the future and nature of science “communication” and journalism is being debated (see here & here), how about going ixnay on the stock essence-of-science pseudo-art? From “Science communication reconsidered,” recently published in Nature, and not, as one might suppose, from recent research on giant sperm.

So long as the future and nature of science “communication” and journalism is being debated (see here & here), how about going ixnay on the stock essence-of-science pseudo-art? From “Science communication reconsidered,” recently published in Nature, and not, as one might suppose, from recent research on giant sperm.